Archive for March, 2011

To Subscribe or Not To Subscribe…

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011

I don’t have a print subscription to The Times, but like many Millennials, I receive NYTimes.com alerts to my Gmail account, I use the free NYTimes app on my smart phone to see Top News and I read articles of interest that show up in my personal twitter and Facebook feeds. Now the publisher wants to tell me something. An image of the letter is below, but here are the highlights:

- NYTimes.com is now offering digital subscriptions. This service was rolled out to customers in Canada on March 18 and will become available to the U.S. and the rest of the world on March 28

- NYTimes.com readers without a subscription will have access to a maximum of 20 articles/videos/slideshows/features a month. To access more, online readers will have to subscribe.

 - Current subscribers to the print issue will have unlimited access to NYTimes.com

 - Smartphone and tablet apps will still provide the top news section for free, but to access other sections through the apps, readers will have to subscribe.

 - There is no option to solely purchase a subscription to NYTimes.com, subscribers much choose:
    – $15 every 4 weeks for NYTimes.com and smartphone app access
    - $20 every 4 weeks for NYTimes.com and tablet app access
    - $35 every 4 weeks for NYTimes.com and smartphone app, and tablet app access
    – $29.60 every 4 weeks for NYTimes.com access and daily print issue home delivery (this is the rate in Atlanta, rates vary based on location)

 - Reader’s accessing NYTimes.com content via blogs, social media or search engines (like Google) will not be limited to the 20 features a month.

This new policy leaves me feeling conflicted. On one hand, I believe the free flow of news and information via technology is one of the greatest things to happen in my lifetime. With a device and connection to the internet, we have access to endless amounts of up-to-date information. My constant companion and smart phone tells me things before they can even be formatted for print, let alone delivered to my front door step. And much of this is free. And while I’d argue that this type of information exchange is invaluable to society, value typically comes with a price.

If we want something that is high quality, we usually have to pay for it. While the free flow of news and information makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside, I have to remember that newspapers are a business – businesses that appear to require subscription and advertising dollars in order to survive. Yes, I want free information, but I also want accurate and clear information compiled by credible sources. What’s the point of receiving free information if it’s wrong?

There are a few points I find strange. First, why the price difference between the smart phone and tablet applications? Will they be dramatically different? Why is there no incentive for the unlimited option? It just appears to be the cost of the two options combined. Technically, doesn’t this option require subscribers to pay twice for the NYTimes.com access? Why is this change happening now? Is there any relation to the new Apple App store subscription policy entitling the company to 30 percent of all subscriptions sales through the App store?

While considering whether a digital subscription was worthwhile for me I realized that the way I currently access information from NYTimes (via blog, Google, social media, top news on my smart phone) means I will be relatively unaffected by these policies.

This leaves me wondering how many other Millenials are in the same situation and what audience is this really affecting? Who out there is the 20+ NYTimes.com article reader that only access content via the official website? Are tablet subscribers surprised that accessing the New York Times will come with a subscription fee when many other tablet media applications already require one? And finally, is this news revolutionary enough to be worthy of a NYTimes.com News Alert in my Gmail account or is that free service gone as well?

The MSLGROUP Guide to Facebook Updates

Monday, March 21st, 2011

The MSLGROUP Guide to Facebook Updates

Launch of Government Safer Products Web Portal Poses Business-Critical Challenge for Manufacturers, Retailers

Friday, March 18th, 2011

MSL Boston has issued a TrendSpotter white paper offering insights on the Corporate and Consumer communications implications of SaferProducts.gov, an online portal launched last month by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Consumers are able to use the portal to file complaints regarding any retail product they feel is badly made, defective, unsafe, etc. Any product within the CPSC’s regulatory purview — from jewelry to toys, coffee makers to cribs, garden tools to printers — could be the subject of publicly accessible and searchable claims.

An excerpt:

Our Counsel: Get Ready and Tell Your Story

Even as the CPCS delays one key provision in the law to the apparent benefit of manufacturers, the web portal goes forward. So what should manufacturers and retailers be doing? The answer should include an aggressive approach involving external and internal audiences, public affairs and an overarching pro-active strategy for dealing with the potential flood of complaints that may come once SaferProducts.gov is public.”

To read the full paper, visit: http://bit.ly/gxlETn

37signals You Have Successfully Weathered a Customer Service Storm

Wednesday, March 16th, 2011

All too often, companies give in to the instinct of burying their corporate heads in the sand when crises arise, instead of immediately engaging their customers.

In “How To Ride a Storm” (Inc., Feb. 2011), 37signals co-founder Jason Fried shares his company’s honest, transparent approach to dealing with unhappy customers when it’s Campfire product malfunctioned.

“When one of our products malfunctioned, thousands of stranded customers erupted in fury. Yet we came out of the crisis more credible than ever.”

Fried’s approach was to regularly update 37signals’ website with service repair status updates and engage each individual customer through Twitter who was voicing their ire or concern. They also took the blame. They acknowledged their responsibility for letting Campfire falter.

“We are battling demons on all fronts and losing. It’s pathetic, I know,” tweets 37signals co-founder, David Heinemeier. “We’re spending the goodwill we’ve built from years of reliable service like it’s going out of style.”

By signaling to customers that they were committed to fixing the problem while providing a continuous stream of status updates, 37signals avoided eroding all credibility as a service provider, and endeared itself to customers who saw 37signals as a true partner commitment to the needs of its customers.

They get it. In the always on conversation, 37signals made sure to openly communicate with its unsatisfied customers and strengthened its authenticity as a brand.

http://www.inc.com/magazine/20110201/how-to-turn-disaster-into-gold.html

What the Egyptian Revolution Can Tell Marketers About Social Media

Monday, March 14th, 2011

Michael Sullivan, Director of MSLGROUP’s North America Consumer Practice, describes how the Egyptian revolution was initially sparked by ‘Facebook-enabled young Egyptians’ but that other channels helped to boost a movement of change. 

The lesson for marketers in all of this: ‘In an increasingly interconnected world, behavior is based on boundless channels of communication, and ascribing primacy to just one channell be it social media, traditional media, advertising or whatever comes next is likely to overestimate the importance of that channel and diminish the essential roles played by all other means of communicating and motivating behavior.’

Read the entire article on the ADWEEK web site: http://j.mp/msullivan-adweek

Moving Business Forward In Real Time

Thursday, March 10th, 2011
Renee Wilson, President of MSLGROUP Americas’ Northeast Region and MD of our New York office, recently featured in The PR Strategist , discusses the changing role of PR in the world of real-time communications.
 

How Real-Time Engagement Reset the Market
BY RENEE WILSON

We’ve read more than enough information about the financial crisis during the past two years. The seismic cultural shifts digital technology brought about are well documented. We’re up to speed on consumers’ burgeoning demands for instant information and entertainment. But what do these changes mean for PR practitioners? Somehow, amid the scramble for survival, a new discipline called “realtime engagement” reset the market, allowing new players and opportunities to materialize. Only PR professionals who adapt to these changes will move their businesses forward.

Managing changing times

While many companies had to cut back during the recent recession, digital communication vehicles and channels grew. When marketers emerged from their bunkers, they found a drastically different media environment, with consumers quickly adapting their behaviors to a new norm.

Communication and entertainment channels — and the way that consumers interact with them — have been permanently redefined. A web of nonstop engagement across multiple social networks is creating never-before-seen demands for instant information and gratification. To stay relevant, we must connect with audiences in real time, a mandate that presents significant yet exciting challenges.

Among them:

-   Crafting and managing unified narratives for multiple audiences and channels has never been more challenging or more rewarding.

-   Delivering real-time engagement services calls for new thinking, new skills and new organizational structures.

-   Navigating communication channels that are always on and that can change or disappear overnight requires unprecedented agility, creativity and speed. This is especially true if the content is user- generated.

Leading the engagement

PR practitioners are ideally positioned to pick up the real-time engagement mantle and lead clients through this new landscape. Why? Because we have the credibility to be the point people in the marketing mix, and we know how to integrate and manage traditional and digital channels. Engaging people in conversation is our strength. The key now is to start doing what we do well in real time, all the time.

Real-time engagement involves using experience, insight and analytics to engage consumers in conversation “right now” to manage reputation, harness creativity and create strong relationships between people and brands. To master this skill, we must understand the components of real-time engagement and use them to build a strategy that meets organizational objectives. The four components are:

Real-time conversations: Influencer marketing and word-of-mouth initiate credible conversations between consumers and companies. The point, no matter how we propel the message (tweeting, blogging), is to inspire people to start talking.

Real-time communities: Influencers, fans and organizers are passionate about brands, products and causes. There are plenty of communities out there, but those with proactively managed standards, applications and compelling content are the most effective.

Real-time content: Content generation is no longer controlled exclusively by professionals at broadcast networks or publications. Today, consumers and companies produce compelling content that heightens awareness; then they distribute and promote it on YouTube, blogs and Facebook. The challenge for brands is managing their stories and corporate narratives in this fragmented environment.

Real-time conversion: The purpose of real-time communications is to drive actual transactions. Analytics, search and other tools can convert conversations, communities and content into business results.

A real-time case: UL

After more than 115 years as the leader in product safety, Underwriters Laboratories (UL) saw an opportunity to raise brand awareness among a new generation of consumers. Manning, Selvage & Lee (MS&L) helped devise a real-time safety “movement” targeting new moms — an audience especially interested in home safety.

The holistic approach, which included a safety website, blogs, social media networks, print and broadcast media, live events and entertainment programming, allowed UL to leverage its proud tradition and create multiple touch points to give moms a sense of community and an ongoing connection to a brand they trust.

“There’s so much information available and no way for consumers to know if it’s credible,” says Sara Greenstein, senior vice president, chief marketing and strategy officer, at UL. “As moms hear UL talking about safety in multiple places, they get to know us, trust us and interact with us in ways that are meaningful to their everyday lives.”

Now in its third year, UL’s campaign has increased company awareness by 15 percent, and the company is building on the opportunity to grow a new generation of safety-conscious consumers.

“Our program is effective because it was completely integrated from the beginning,” says Greenstein. “And we’re flexible: We see which messages and channels moms grab on to, go where those conversations take us and make decisions in real time.”

Being Engaged: Then and Now

Then

Now

PR professionals maintain media lists with journalists’ and influencers’ names and phone numbers

Bloggers, Twitter users, cause advocates and brand ambassadors represent online communities and influencers

 

Executives direct and delegate to account teams within multilayer agencies

Executives (who stay close to the business for quick decision- making) lead flat organizations with nimble teams

Major publishers and production companies drive traditional print and broadcast media

Brands acting as media outlets and deliver user-generated content

News deadlines and production schedules dictate how professionals manage work

News cycle is 24/7

Local or regional stories break in hours or days

Global stories break in seconds or minutes

Employees and consumers adapt to digital environments

Digital “native” employees (i.e., Gen-Y) lead the workforce and market

Consumers use physical entertainment channels such as CDs and DVDs

Consumers tune in to cloud-based entertainment channels and branded platforms, utilities and applications

Process-driven firms court mainstream media and analysts

Agile, highly creative agencies focus on analytics

and influencers

 

A real-time case: General Motors

GM Education is a portal on the company website that houses the “Teach Green” educator blog. GM recently added an application developed by MS&L using Google Earth to show students how energy is produced and used around the globe. The launch campaign targeted bloggers, Twitter users and a community of people who share digital applications in real time. It was also publicized on the Chevy Volt Facebook page and AutoblogGreen, a site covering vehicle and technology news.

Sharon Basel, GM’s manager of environment and energy communications, says that the response has been positive. “We’re not trying to sell cars with this program — we want engagement and conversations,” she says.

“Social networks give us a constant loop to capture more and more people. Our outreach team keeps conversations moving, which attracts whole new audiences.”

Moving business forward

People compare the evolution of social media and realtime engagement to the Internet: First it was a renegade medium, then it was a marketing tool and finally it was a customer-relationship management must-have. Likewise, real-time engagement vehicles will continue to evolve in light of privacy concerns, monetization by major players and editing by consumers looking for utility or entertainment value.