Archive for the ‘Conversation’ Category

Do’s and Don’ts of Pitching Media

Monday, June 20th, 2011

Top do’s and don’ts of pitching media:

Do – Read, listen to or watch the media outlets you’re looking to get into so you understand what kind of stories they cover and how they cover them. Do they do live interviews? Do they use prepared/press release copy? Do they use video footage or photos? Get to know the media outlets you want to be in and supply them the things they need. Make it easier for them to cover your story than the 100 other pitches they get each week. Reporters want to know you’re familiar with their work and their outlet and having this familiarity will help you prepare and pitch your story more efficiently.

Do — Make yourself available and keep appointments. If you get a reporter interested in your story, be flexible about when you can do the interview. Many reporters are working on five or six stories at the same time. If they’re only available to interview you between noon and 2:30 on Thursday, make yourself free then or they may just move on to another story. Once you have the interview booked, make sure you’re there in person or you’re there by the phone at the appointed time.

Do — Pay attention to what else is going on in your market or industry when you make your announcements or pitch your story. This will help you find times that are better to pitch than others. If you’re a technology company and you’re planning a major press announcement, don’t do it on the same day Apple is supposed to announce the next iPhone — every tech reporter in the world will be focused on that story, not yours. If you’re pitching a story about your company’s donation to a local charity, don’t do it on the day your city or state is having elections — all your local news resources will be focused on that story.

Do — Become a resource for reporters in your industry. Every story can’t be about you, but you can position yourself and your company as an expert resource to talk about trends in your industry. By helping reporters out with these larger trend pieces with comments, insight and expertise, those reporters will be more willing to cover your big story when the time comes.

Don’t – Hound reporters. Many people think calling and emailing reporters over and over will get them to cover your story. But being too aggressive can actually repel reporters. Know that reporters spend at least a few minutes with every pitch they get and if they’re interested, they will call you for more information. A quick follow up call a few days after you send your pitch can help, but calling day after day on the same story will just make the reporter angry. Be an ongoing resource for reporters in your space, but don’t call over and over on the same story.

Don’t — Invest in flashy press kits. Most reporters don’t have time to wade through thick, complex press kits with photos, big brochures, multiple pages, etc. to figure out what the news in there is. A simple email with a good pitch, a press release and images illustrating the products or services you’re pitching will be sufficient. If your item requires some kind of hand-on experience, follow up with a call to see if the reporter would like an in-person demo.

Let the PR tips above strengthen your pitching efforts and help you land the media attention you want.

This post was recently published on Brandmakernews.com. To see the full article, click here.

My Social Tattoo

Wednesday, June 8th, 2011

How much has social media permeated our lives? This user takes her most important online friends and brings them to life in a full sleeve tattoo made up of their profile pics.

“Finishing my social tattoo with 152 pictures of my Facebook Friends!  Of course I gave it a lot of thought. These are not all my friends. Just the people I care most about. I got their permission and they were very proud to be on it. To me it represents who I am right now and the time we live in. And of course I love the looks of it.”

As a lover of ink, I think it’s pretty cool, especially since since she links the significance of the age we live in to her body art. It’s also a pretty great conversation starter!

The Tattoo is designed by Pretty Social and the tattoo artist is Tattoo Dex.

2020 Marketing: Consumer Expects More

Friday, April 8th, 2011

Interesting article and white paper discussing the next decade of Marketing and changes in consumer expectations, involvement, and personalization, including reference to “Just for Me” product design, per Tom Lowry of Google and “consumers now being co-creators.  They are us.  Consumers are now in Marketing.”  Enjoy!

2020 Marketing: Consumer Expects More
Premium content from Atlanta Business Chronicle – by Ken Bernhardt
Date: Friday, April 1, 2011, 6:00am EDT

The Atlanta chapter of the American Marketing Association recently convened its executive advisory board to discuss marketing in the next decade and how marketers can prepare for the changes that will be taking place. The members include 21 senior marketers from companies such as AirTran Airway, Wendy’s/Arby’s Group Inc., AT&T Inc., Chick-fil-A, The Coca-Cola Co., Cox Enterprises Inc., Engauge, Google, Kodak  and 22squared Inc.

Elizabeth L. Ward of Thought Partners Consulting was commissioned to prepare a white paper based on the insights from these senior marketing leaders, “20/20 in 2020: Toward a New Vision in Marketing.” I’ll use this column to highlight some of the key findings from this report, which is available at http://amaatlanta.wordpress.com/2011/03/27/2020/.

Three themes are described in the white paper: 1) Shifting sands in the relationship between brands and consumers, 2) the new demand for personalization, and 3) the paradigm shift in the role of marketing and the DNA of the marketing organization.

Relationship between brands and consumers: The balance of power continues to shift with consumers gaining increasing clout. Consumers expect a higher level of service and more immediate response to their demands and feedback. They expect more personalized recognition commensurate with the amount of business they do with the company and the amount of information they give. Ten years ago marketers “drove consumers to websites and pushed and pulled them to products marketers wanted them to buy.” Increasingly, marketers will need to solicit consumers’ willingness to participate and engage them in real dialogue. Relationship-building will precede or even replace the sales pitch, and companies will focus on building brand advocates. As Richard Ward, CEO of 22squared, put it, “Consumers want to be recognized and rewarded for being an active participant in the relationship with the brand.”

Rewards will become increasingly personalized, based on each customer’s past purchases and expressed interests. Going forward, marketing departments will need to recognize that consumers are co-creators and it will become less clear who reports to whom.

New demand for personalization: Consumers’ expectations for customized experiences and increased personalization will grow exponentially. Consumers are willing to share a large amount of information in return for receiving more personalized experiences, but marketers are just beginning to figure out how to use that information to deliver truly customized experiences.

Social media, mobile devices and localization are all major forces that are converging. Mobile devices will become increasingly important as the pre-eminent customizable device, conveying where you are and what you are doing at any given moment. As Tom Lowry, director of industry and technology for Google, put it, users will have higher expectations of “Just for Me” product design. He names Amazon and Netflix as examples of brands that are delivering personalized messages today.

Changing role of marketing: The skill sets needed in marketing will look dramatically different in the next decade. There will be increased accountability for marketing actions. The speed of change is increasing with “disruptions” in markets happening faster than ever. Therefore marketers will need to retool their planning and decision-making practices to enable them to move at faster speeds.

There will no longer be 12-month planning cycles. Decision-making must occur lower in the organization because there is not time to go up the decision-making ladder. Budgets and resource allocation will have to become more flexible to enable marketers to quickly respond to opportunities and respond to changing consumer needs.

Product life cycles will become shorter. Market intelligence will require new tools to keep a constant finger on the pulse of consumers. Listening to consumers will become part of everyone’s job. Marketers will need to find the right balance between precision and speed. They will need to form a closer relationship between marketing and IT. Currently there is too much data and too few insights.

Words of advice for 2020: The final section of the white paper presents the following advice for marketers:

• Pay close attention to customer experience. As products and prices are increasingly at parity, the total brand experience (and especially customer service) will become the key differentiator. As one board member put it, “customer service will become the next killer app.”

• Be real and have nothing to hide. Consumers increasingly have ways of finding out if you are cheating or faking (think “greenwashing”).

• Deliver value to customers by using the information you have gathered from them and they will give you value in return.

• Focus on the most important ways to customize, allowing customers to personalize the products/services/experiences (including method of payment, delivery, data portability, and functionality).

• Rethink organization structure and leadership values to be more responsive to the changing needs of the market.

• Test. Learn. Repeat.

All of this sounds like good advice to me. The next decade will have more changes in marketing than any previous decade. It’s a great time to be in marketing.

Bernhardt is the Taylor E. Little Jr. Professor of Marketing and Special Assistant to the Dean, J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University.

Read more: 2020 marketing: consumer expects more | Atlanta Business Chronicle

To Subscribe or Not To Subscribe…

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011

I don’t have a print subscription to The Times, but like many Millennials, I receive NYTimes.com alerts to my Gmail account, I use the free NYTimes app on my smart phone to see Top News and I read articles of interest that show up in my personal twitter and Facebook feeds. Now the publisher wants to tell me something. An image of the letter is below, but here are the highlights:

- NYTimes.com is now offering digital subscriptions. This service was rolled out to customers in Canada on March 18 and will become available to the U.S. and the rest of the world on March 28

- NYTimes.com readers without a subscription will have access to a maximum of 20 articles/videos/slideshows/features a month. To access more, online readers will have to subscribe.

 - Current subscribers to the print issue will have unlimited access to NYTimes.com

 - Smartphone and tablet apps will still provide the top news section for free, but to access other sections through the apps, readers will have to subscribe.

 - There is no option to solely purchase a subscription to NYTimes.com, subscribers much choose:
    – $15 every 4 weeks for NYTimes.com and smartphone app access
    - $20 every 4 weeks for NYTimes.com and tablet app access
    - $35 every 4 weeks for NYTimes.com and smartphone app, and tablet app access
    – $29.60 every 4 weeks for NYTimes.com access and daily print issue home delivery (this is the rate in Atlanta, rates vary based on location)

 - Reader’s accessing NYTimes.com content via blogs, social media or search engines (like Google) will not be limited to the 20 features a month.

This new policy leaves me feeling conflicted. On one hand, I believe the free flow of news and information via technology is one of the greatest things to happen in my lifetime. With a device and connection to the internet, we have access to endless amounts of up-to-date information. My constant companion and smart phone tells me things before they can even be formatted for print, let alone delivered to my front door step. And much of this is free. And while I’d argue that this type of information exchange is invaluable to society, value typically comes with a price.

If we want something that is high quality, we usually have to pay for it. While the free flow of news and information makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside, I have to remember that newspapers are a business – businesses that appear to require subscription and advertising dollars in order to survive. Yes, I want free information, but I also want accurate and clear information compiled by credible sources. What’s the point of receiving free information if it’s wrong?

There are a few points I find strange. First, why the price difference between the smart phone and tablet applications? Will they be dramatically different? Why is there no incentive for the unlimited option? It just appears to be the cost of the two options combined. Technically, doesn’t this option require subscribers to pay twice for the NYTimes.com access? Why is this change happening now? Is there any relation to the new Apple App store subscription policy entitling the company to 30 percent of all subscriptions sales through the App store?

While considering whether a digital subscription was worthwhile for me I realized that the way I currently access information from NYTimes (via blog, Google, social media, top news on my smart phone) means I will be relatively unaffected by these policies.

This leaves me wondering how many other Millenials are in the same situation and what audience is this really affecting? Who out there is the 20+ NYTimes.com article reader that only access content via the official website? Are tablet subscribers surprised that accessing the New York Times will come with a subscription fee when many other tablet media applications already require one? And finally, is this news revolutionary enough to be worthy of a NYTimes.com News Alert in my Gmail account or is that free service gone as well?

The MSLGROUP Guide to Facebook Updates

Monday, March 21st, 2011

The MSLGROUP Guide to Facebook Updates

37signals You Have Successfully Weathered a Customer Service Storm

Wednesday, March 16th, 2011

All too often, companies give in to the instinct of burying their corporate heads in the sand when crises arise, instead of immediately engaging their customers.

In “How To Ride a Storm” (Inc., Feb. 2011), 37signals co-founder Jason Fried shares his company’s honest, transparent approach to dealing with unhappy customers when it’s Campfire product malfunctioned.

“When one of our products malfunctioned, thousands of stranded customers erupted in fury. Yet we came out of the crisis more credible than ever.”

Fried’s approach was to regularly update 37signals’ website with service repair status updates and engage each individual customer through Twitter who was voicing their ire or concern. They also took the blame. They acknowledged their responsibility for letting Campfire falter.

“We are battling demons on all fronts and losing. It’s pathetic, I know,” tweets 37signals co-founder, David Heinemeier. “We’re spending the goodwill we’ve built from years of reliable service like it’s going out of style.”

By signaling to customers that they were committed to fixing the problem while providing a continuous stream of status updates, 37signals avoided eroding all credibility as a service provider, and endeared itself to customers who saw 37signals as a true partner commitment to the needs of its customers.

They get it. In the always on conversation, 37signals made sure to openly communicate with its unsatisfied customers and strengthened its authenticity as a brand.

http://www.inc.com/magazine/20110201/how-to-turn-disaster-into-gold.html

Five Top Super Bowl XLV Social Media/Mobile Campaigns

Friday, January 21st, 2011

Alas, the Atlanta Falcons are out of the playoffs, but don’t tune out just yet. Some of the biggest players aren’t setting their sights on the Lombardi trophy, but will be fighting for a title just as prestigious – to be the biggest brand at the Super Bowl. By throwing out budgets, giving credence to the wildest ideas in the brainstorm and utilizing the latest technologies, brands will fight for the honor of being the company you bring up at the water cooler on Feb. 7.

Below are  some of the best social media and mobile campaigns and contests to look out for leading up to and during Super Bowl XLV.

Coors Light

Snap, Send, Score – Doesn’t get much easier than that. Using your mobile phone, “snap” a picture of a unique upc code on Coors Light products and even in store, outdoor or online advertising, “send” the picture via text or e-mail to Coors Light and “score” instant-win prizes. The unique mobile incorporation, instant gratification for contestants and heightened brand awareness for all participants make this contest a winner.

If you’ve got a camera phone and are purchasing some brews, take a picture of these things on the package or on promotional materials and text to 26753 or send it to coors@snaptag.mobi. Click here for more info: http://www.coorslight.com/superbowl/how.aspx

Doritos/Pepsi Max

While run through its own sites, Doritos and Pepsi utilize all social media outlets to promote the Crash the Super Bowl promotion, which promises to air during the Super Bowl the best fan-created commercials. In the age where a kid singing into a webcam can go viral and get 30 million views, incentivizing clever and tech-savvy people to create high-viral potential commercials about the product is a win-win. Additionally, they’ve built in milestones wherein if your commercial ranks as one of the top rated during the game, you’ll get a ton more money and meet with their ad agency to consult on future campaigns.

Voting is still up, so be sure to take a look and pick the best one on www.Crashthesuperbowl.com (I’m torn between House Sitting and The Best Part myself).

Mercedes-Benz

“The First Twitter-Fueled Race” is a bit complicated but an incredibly unique idea. Four two-person teams in different parts of the country are given different Mercedes-Benz cars and told to drive to Dallas, site of Super Bowl XLV. These aren’t ordinary cars, but fuel economy/horsepower is somehow affected by Twitter activity (Mercedez is mum on the details, preferring to describe them simply as “Twitter-fueled automobiles”). People can choose which team to support and give them extra “fuel” by hashtagging or retweeting their messages. There’s also celebrity tweeters for each team who can give them a literal boost with their twitter activity. First to make it to Dallas wins, and you can win Super Bowl tix as well if you help “fuel” the winning team to victory.

It might be confusing and Tweets probably won’t replace fossil fuels anytime soon, but the thinking behind this contest has to appreciated – kudos to Mercedes for taking a risk on a crazy idea that might just be a big hit.

You can follow the action and participate on their Facebook page here:http://www.facebook.com/mercedesbenzusa

PhoneDog /Cost Plus World Market

The exact opposite of Mercedes, these contests are simple and straightforward: “Like” PhoneDog or Cost Plus World Market on Facebook and automatically get entered to win hundreds of prizes worth close to a half million bucks. Rather than a traditional sweepstakes that helps companies build a database for mailers/e-mail that people often ignore, these companies will get new fans on Facebook to see every update they post. To topi it off, they also get a measurable audience with built-in analytics and an impressive follower number that will make them even more appealing to potential followers.

You can like these companies here:

http://www.facebook.com/worldmarket

http://www.facebook.com/worldmarkethttp://www.facebook.com/phonedog

Audi

Audi will seek out and reward 10 of their social media fans with the “most original and numerous” posts before the Super Bowl with trips and other expensive prizes. However, much like selling cookies or wrapping paper in grade school, this contest rewards elbow grease for social media users. It also levels the playing field by not counting impressions, just posts, so you don’t have to be @ParisHilton to have a shot at winning.

To participate, just start tweeting and Facebook posting about Audi – simple enough!

Flurry of Changes Mark Transition of Atlanta Media into 2011

Saturday, January 15th, 2011

As “Atlanta Snowmageddon” finally thaws, it’s time to examine the flurry of recent changes in the Atlanta media landscape. For organizations pitching stories in the ATL and surrounding markets, there continues to be growth on each end of the spending spectrum, with new bargain bloggers and luxury writers doing well. And the spotlight continues to shine on home-grown reporting. 

In 2011 “hyperlocal” is still a hot trend with a brand new series of Websites called The Patch (Patch.com) hiring editors who write about specialized areas of town ranging from Marietta to Buckhead to Stone Mountain and many more. Not to be outdone, television station WXIA-TV has introduced the “Where U Live” feature, 50 community sites encompassing areas of Metro Atlanta for coverage.

Sites such as TheExaminer.com Atlanta have a variety of contributors, particularly on family and community events. And sites such as Atlanta Moms Like Me continue to gain members and momentum.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and AJC.com have become very blog and Twitter-active, so there are lots more ways to get small-bite news stories into the cycle.

The AJC has tapped a new “Bargain Hunter,” Lauren Davidson, who writes about deals in a city dominated by Scoutmob, Groupon and other new cost-saving and bartering technologies. She’s part of a growing category of bargain bloggers ranging from Jennifer Maciejewski at AtlantaOnTheCheap.com to Jessica Dauler of JessicaShops.com.

Arts and culture in the city is also getting a spotlight thanks to sites such as ArtsCriticATL.com and Atlanta Plan It (atlantaplanit.com). Sports coverage, however, has tightened, with stations such as WGCL-TV outsourcing content duties to radio station 790/The Zone.

The latest additions to the local magazine scene are Buckhead Home & Life, which reaches homeowners and businesses in one of Atlanta’s high-end neighborhoods, and Atlanta Girl, focusing on teen empowerment with a high-fashion edge. Dickey Publishing, owners of Jezebel, have purchased The Atlantan, adding more luxury lifestyle firepower to their portfolio. 

Now on its 6th quarterly newsstand issue, Get Married Magazine (getmarried.com), targets newly engaged couples in the peak stages of wedding planning and purchasing. This locally-originated title can now be found alongside nationals such as Lucky in the “shopping and trend guide” section at major retailers.

The radio dials continue to shift with news/talk 750 WSB-AM adding an FM signal at 95.5, displacing the urban/rap format of The Beat. Now fans of hip-hop can tune into Groove 105.7 as an option. Oldies 106.7 is now Atlanta’s Greatest Hits 106.7 24/7 with a decidedly ‘70’s emphasis.

Some familiar faces are gone from the Atlanta airwaves – namely, Good Day Atlanta’s Suchita Vadlamani who has been a fixture of Good Day Atlanta on FOX 5 for nearly a decade; much-touted fresh face Dagmar Midcap of WGCL Weather; and, after 46 years in the business, John Pruitt of Channel 2 Action News. Behind the scenes, Nina Brown, formerly a producer at V-103 Radio, now has a role on the team at 11 Alive. Expect 2011 to usher in many more personalities to the scene.

We’ve certainly been relying on the media more than ever as our roads have become sheets of ice this week. It’s great to witness an amazing intersection of traditional and consumer-generated content that keeps the media business exciting.

Is the Web Dead?

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

via Wired Magazine

I picked up the new issue of Wired Magazine this past weekend and was drawn in by the cover story – The Web is Dead. The story focuses on the move from the “world wide web” to applications independent of browsers.

Chris Anderson makes an interesting point:

“Over the past few years, one of the most important shifts in the digital world has been the move from the wide-open Web to semiclosed platforms that use the Internet for transport but not the browser for display. It’s driven primarily by the rise of the iPhone model of mobile computing, and it’s a world Google can’t crawl, one where HTML doesn’t rule. And it’s the world that consumers are increasingly choosing, not because they’re rejecting the idea of the Web but because these dedicated platforms often just work better or fit better into their lives.”

Over the last week, I’ve seen quite a few disagreeing posts and conversations around Anderson’s article; however, there are a few things that we, as communication professionals, can take away from the overall discussion.

We have to be ready to take the conversation anywhere. First it was newspapers and radio, and then on to television; now we are moving beyond just web browsers to take brands into the hands of consumers (literally) through applications and mobile devices. As the web continues to evolve and communications channels change, it’s our job to understand the medium so that we can counsel our clients on how their target audiences are using it.

The Internet will continue to infiltrate our everyday activities. The bigger story isn’t about the technology or applications, but about how the internet shapes our habits and activities. Communication professionals should look for ways to share information and engage stakeholders through digital channels, including mobile, in addition to our “tried and true” channels.

There will always be the next big thing. We can’t always predict what the “next big thing” will be; however, we can stay focused on the bigger picture. Platforms like Foursquare and Twitter are great, but we must look at the behavior around them and what that tells us about consumers’ needs, not the channels themselves.

The BCS Controversy is Good for your Brand

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

via UPI.com

As week one of the 2010-11 college football season approaches, mention the Bowl Championship Series to a typical fan and get ready for a lecture.

It’s unfair, it favors perennial heavyweights without giving up-and-coming teams a chance or it’s a shameless money-making scheme for the conferences and TV networks are all common complaints. After all, Utah destroyed Alabama in the 2009 Sugar Bowl and was the only undefeated team that season, the 2007 LSU squad was the first 2-loss champion in college football history and, let’s be honest, Ohio State didn’t deserve to be in the same stadium as Florida in 2006.

But the BCS has managed, inadvertently or otherwise, to do what every other college or professional sport wishes it could – it generates conversation after the championship game is over.

Controversy breeds conversation, and no sport ends its season more contentiously than college football. In every other major sport, only one team wins their last game of the post-season, and they are declared the league champion. In college football, half the teams win their last game.

How is this good for college football? People talk. They talk about who would’ve won if the BCS champion played the winner of the 3-4 match-up or how their team’s defensive scheme could’ve stopped the BCS champion when their opponent couldn’t. And they don’t forget – Auburn fans still talk about their 2004 snub and Boise State will remind anyone listening that they’ve been undefeated since 2008 without any serious BCS Championship consideration.

But most importantly, they watch. Whether to fuel their ire or rectify last season’s injustices, college football fans will forever tune in next season to see what happens.

The proof is in the numbers – 17.7 percent of U.S. television viewers watched Alabama and Texas play in the BCS Championship game in January, as compared with 12.8 percent who watched the NBA Finals, 11.7 percent who watched the World Series, 9.7 percent who watched the Final Four and 4.7 percent who watched the Stanley Cup Finals. Only the Super Bowl has better ratings.

Controversy is not always bad, even though we’ve been tempered by oil spills and stuck gas pedals to think it so. Controversy begets discussion and spurs otherwise ambivalent parties to action. While not fit for every brand or every situation, an ounce of controversy can be worth a pound of traditional PR.

Just ask Burger King. In early 2009, the company rolled out the “Whopper Sacrifice,” a Facebook application that rewarded users with a coupon for a free Whopper for every 10 friends they “defriended” on Facebook. Rather than allow an anonymous defriending, the application also alerted each defriended victim that they had been ditched for a free Whopper. Despite its controversial purpose, the application was extremely well-received by Facebook users, resulting in the defriending of 233,906 friends in less than a week (before it was shut down by Facebook for “privacy reasons”). Burger King also received extensive press coverage and incited debate among brand experts and consumers about whether it was ethical to promote and reward anti-social behavior in social media.

Burger King took a product it has sold since 1957 and used controversy to reinvigorate its brand awareness more than 50 years later. The sandwich was exactly the same and the price hadn’t changed, but the campaign generated hundreds of millions of impressions featuring the Whopper.

Squeaky clean PR has its place, especially if your company’s line of work invites controversy to begin with or is in a heavily regulated industry. But if you’re hawking burgers or the BCS, controversy may just work for you and your brand.