Archive for August, 2011

Homeward Bound: The Shift of Devices from Hospital to Home

Wednesday, August 31st, 2011

Currently, there is a shift in clinical practice that is increasingly moving away from hospital-based care toward home healthcare monitoring technology. The aging population’s desire for independence is a major driving force behind this trend. According to a recent Washington Post/AARP study, 92 percent of Americans aged 65-74 say they want to “age in place” (i.e., remain in the home for as long as possible). Similarly, for those 75 and older, about 95 percent say they want to live out their lives in their homes. Other drivers are converging to push more medical devices into the home:

  • The length of hospital stays is decreasing as hospitals look to cut costs by discharging patients faster.
  • The wide prevalence of Internet access, both at home and on smart phones, offers patients more health information resources than ever before.
    • In November 2010, nearly 17,000 health apps were available in major app stores
    • Groupon, one of the five fastest-growing Internet sites, offers deals on eye exams, teeth-cleaning and chiropractic services
    • Patients are becoming much more deft with mobile-computing and wireless communications technologies in their consumer lives. Industry has responded with redesigned, patient-friendly technology ranging from ventilators to drug-delivery devices.
    • There is a continuing growth in the number of medications for treating chronic conditions, such as diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis, where people are typically administering the drugs themselves at home. Within that growth are trends toward different types of devices that offer usability benefits, such as ease of use, portability, a longer battery life, and enhanced dosing. (more…)

Which vs. That

Friday, August 26th, 2011

Disclaimer: Dust off your middle school notebooks because we’re about to enter the hot land of clauses. Oh yes, clauses. Yowza!


Background

People tend to use “that” and “which” interchangeably to combine two thoughts or sentences; however they serve different purposes. “That” and “which” are pronouns used before a clause in a sentence. “That” is used in restrictive clauses while “which” is used in nonrestrictive clauses. As it may have been a while since you’ve thought about said clauses, let’s dive deeper.

Restrictive Clause – That

A restrictive clause is a part of a sentence that limits or restricts the subject. Removing a restrictive clause changes the meaning of a sentence.

Nonrestrictive Clause – Which

A nonrestrictive clause adds further information to a sentence, but is not vital to its meaning. Nonrestrictive clauses can be removed without changing the meaning of the sentence.

Usage

That:

  • Songs that include a fiddle are often considered bluegrass.

If we remove “that include a fiddle” from the sentence, the statement becomes inaccurate as not all songs are considered bluegrass.

Which:

  • I like bluegrass music, which usually includes a fiddle.

If we remove the clause, “which usually includes a fiddle,” the sentence can still stand alone. I can still like bluegrass music with or without a fiddle.

Tip

To determine whether to use “that” or “which,” ask yourself if the clause can be removed without changing the meaning of the sentence. If it can, use “which.” If it can’t, use “that.”

Another tip: Ask yourself if you need a comma. If you do, use “which.”

Will brand narratives rewrite marketing history?

Monday, August 22nd, 2011

Years ago, I read the book, Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind, by Jack Trout and Al Ries. It was considered revolutionary when it was first published in 1981, especially the idea that, “Positioning is not what you do to a product. Positioning is what you do to the mind of the prospect.”

Thirty years later, that concept is still pretty powerful. But the world has changed. Consumers are no longer captive audiences waiting to drink in one-way messages. They’re now creating their own content. They’re using social and digital media to publish and distribute it. They’re assembling their own communities and making their voices heard. Brand marketing is no longer a matter of doing things to consumers’ minds. It’s finding out what’s on their minds and earning the right to join the conversation. Traditional brand positioning isn’t the answer in this environment. What makes more sense is a brand narrative.

The brand narrative concept is still a little squishy, but to me, it’s the art of packaging a brand in bite-sized, sharable pieces wrapped in the consumer’s perspective. Here’s an example: Carter’s is a leading manufacturer of baby clothing. Rather than “positioning” the company’s history or product quality, why not connect with moms’ emotions by engaging them in the intimacy of bedtime rituals? Giving them ways to share their experiences, talk about their feelings as new moms and give each other advice – all made possible by Carter’s – is a lot more compelling than a monologue on fabrics and colors.

I mentioned earning the right to join consumers’ conversations. To do this, you must provide value in the form of entertainment, education or experiences. Think about the conversation you want people to have about you and work backwards. Replace your rigid, one-way, passive brand positioning statement with a flexible, customizable, emotional dialogue your audience can control.

There’s no telling what marketers will say about brand narratives 30 years from now, but it’s working for me right now. What do you think?

NFC Coming to the USA Sooner, Or Later

Friday, August 19th, 2011

The rumor mill for the release of Apple’s iPhone 5 and what new features it will have continues to churn, and one of the most interesting of those rumors is weather the device will have a Near Field Communications chip, or NFC built in. Among other things NFC can be used to support mobile payments, which would represent the convergence of your credit cards with your smartphone.

If iPhone 5 does have an NFC chip, that will clearly put the US market on the fast track for wave to pay solutions. Currently, only one device sold in the US, the Google Nexus S on Sprint, supports NFC payments via the Google Wallet and Paypal mobile. However, similar contactless payment technology has been used in Japan and Korea for years. Japan is now in the process of standardizing their mobile payment systems on NFC, and in Europe and other countries around the world NFC is becoming the standard for wave-to-pay and wave-to “fill in the blank” mobile solutions.

Should iPhone 5 not include NFC that will almost certainly set back the technology for payments for 12 to 16 months. However, even with the potential for a much smaller installed base of NFC smartphone in the market in 2012 – 2013, there are a number of compelling and innovative ways that brands, retailers and marketers can start using NFC technology right now.

If you’re a real DIY techie you can actually add NFC to your existing mobile phone in a few steps and amaze those around you when paying by waving at your local fast food restaurant. Fortunately, there are other work-arounds, which brands and retailers can use to put NFC technology to the test right now. NFC stickers are inexpensive to mass produce, and once the chip that is embedded in one is registered to a mobile number, it opens up many options for applications that can be used to create engaging customer experiences that can spread word of mouth and drive sales.

Renault recently used phone-less NFC as part of their exhibit at the Amsterdam Motor Show allowing attendees to “Like” their cars on Facebook with the wave of a card. This is just one example of the kinds of engagement applications that NFC can support, and savvy retailers are already looking at ways to embed NFC into tags and interactive signage.  Distributing NFC stickers to in-store customers, which are then attached inside or outside the phone, can give brands a compelling platform on which to engage with their most socially active and influential customers.

We’ll know soon just how fast the mobile payment space will grow here in the US, but regardless of that, NFC technology is something that all marketers should begin exploring today.

If you would like to attend my session of NFC for marketers at SXSW Interactive next March, take a few minutes to vote for my panel submission on the topic here.

Me, Myself or I?

Monday, August 15th, 2011

Background
The misuse of “myself” is caused by uncertainty about the use of “me.” Many people believe “me” sounds awkward or incorrect as the object of a sentence, leading them to overcorrect and avoid it where it’s perfectly appropriate.

Usage

Myself and the rest of the self-ish crew (yourself, himself, herself, ourselves, themselves) shouldn’t take the place of the ordinary pronouns I and me. They should be used for only two purposes: to emphasize and to refer to the subject.

Correct:

  • She hates herself.
  • Love itself is a riddle.
  • They consider themselves lucky to be alive.
  • I made the cake myself.
  • And you call yourself a grammarian!

Incorrect:

  • Jack and myself were married yesterday. (It’s Jack and I.)
  • The project made money for Marley and myself. (It’s for Marley and me.)
  • Please send an email to myself and Alina in the next hour or so. (It’s Alina and me.)

Tip

Myself is rarely used in business writing. So, if you are confused, just don’t use it.

I vs. Me

It is a common occurrence to see/hear the incorrect usage of I and me. To keep it simple, follow this rule:

I must be the subject of a verb; me must be the object of the verb. The easiest way to decipher the two is to eliminate the other person from the sentence, leaving I or me by itself, and see if it still makes sense.

For example, you would write, “The odds were against you and me.” (“The odds were against you and me.”) [You wouldn't say, "The odds were against I," right?]

Then there’s the conundrum of whether to use I or me after than. Either one may be correct depending on the meaning of the sentence.

  • David loves pasta more than I. (means “more than I do”)
  • David loves pasta more than me. (means “more than he loves me”)