Archive for the ‘Crisis communications’ Category

Speaker’s Forum: Marino in Texas

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

On April 19, Stephen Marino, the North American director of digital and social media for MSLGROUP presented “Social Media, PR and Issues/Reputation Management” at the AT&T Executive Education and Conference Center at the University of Texas at Austin. Marino’s presentation was the first installment in the Department of Advertising and Public RelationsGwyn David Lecture Series, which was created in honor of the late Gwyn David, who graduated from the College of Communication in 1979. David was senior vice president and media director of GSD&M, an Austin-based advertising agency.

Mario’s speech discussed his work for BP during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill crisis in 2010.

When the 2010 oil spill occurred, Marino – who then served as senior vice president of Digital Influence at New York-based Ogilvy Public Relations – called BP, asking if they needed help with crisis communications. A few weeks later, BP asked him to give a presentation about social media. Although BP had never considered social media an integral part of their communications plan, Marino convinced executives of social media’s importance to crisis communications.

For the next six months, Marino led BP’s social media strategy from a conference center in Houston. He reported to the company’s chief marketing officer, which Marino said was a milestone. It was the first time BP had used social media as an engagement channel and a marketing channel.

MSLGROUP executive Stephen Marino speaks about “Social Media, PR and Issues/Reputation Management” from UT College of Communication on Vimeo.

Read more about Marino’s speech here

When Politics, Advocacy, and Social Media Collide

Friday, February 3rd, 2012

Stephanie Smith, North American Director of Media Serivces

Watching Susan G. Komen Foundation–Planned Parenthood story unfold over the last 48 hours has been a fascinating study in crisis communications, politics, and the power of social media.

It is the perfect storm of issues.
-The politicization of health issues in an increasingly divided government.
-An organization making a decision fundamentally at odds with the beliefs of its core advocates.
-The swift torrent of outrage in social media.
-Savvy reactive strategy to leverage the controversy.

Wherever you may fall on the political spectrum, the last two days have provided a window into how quickly public sentiment is voiced now and how communication strategy in turn has to evolve. Facebook, Twitter and other social media have played an increasing role in the narrative of major stories–that’s not surprising to anyone in the public relations industry. But the size, scope and swiftness of the online reaction to Komen’s decision to defund Planned Parenthood has been simply stunning. The flatfooted response from Komen seems to indicate that leaders at the non-profit had no idea the online and then real world backlash would be so immediate and forceful. In this era where social media is the ultimate sounding board and forum, people vote their dissatisfaction. Instantly.

It should be noted that the battle between these two non-profit giants is not exclusive to the left; this type of conflict could have arisen between two organizations on the right side of the political spectrum just as easily. The fundamental issue here is that two non-profits, ostensibly with similar values, ended up very much at odds.

Planned Parenthood-sponsored hashtag.

Planned Parenthood’s savviness.
The attempted demonization of Planned Parenthood has been underway for quite some time, and ironically the Komen decision has emboldened Planned Parenthood’s advocates in a way that attacks from opponents have not. Planned Parenthood’s handling of this controversy from a communications POV is spot on, taking to social media, emailing their supporters with fundraising requests, and engaging like-minded politicians such as Mike Bloomberg. Planned Parenthood has portrayed itself as the David in this David and Goliath story, and has savvily shaped the narrative to reinforce public sentiment in its favor. It is a case study in effective crisis communications.

Damage done.
On the other end of the spectrum is the Susan G. Komen Foundation. In attempting to recover, CEO Nancy Brinker has given changing explanations to justify the pulling of funds to Planned Parenthood. Komen now faces an uphill battle–creating a consistent message strategy and trying to allay the outrage from supporters. Management could choose to stick with their decision and simply withstand the criticism, hoping the controversy will simply wane. But the perception of having given in to what is a politically motivated issue is taking a severe toll on the organization. Brands, who account for millions in donations to Komen, may pull back, concerned that the organization is playing politics and has become tainted in the minds of consumers. Consumer boycotts are also likely to damage Komen’s fundraising efforts further.

Know your customer.
What is at the core of this controversy is that the Komen foundation either fundamentally forgot or misunderstood the beliefs and values of their core advocates. It’s critically important that a brand understands who its core customers are, who its advocates are, and what values they align with. By moving away from its core values, Komen has alienated a substantial percentage of their stakeholders. If Komen is going to stand for different values moving forward, then they will need to build a new base of support. In the meantime, Komen will become the cautionary tale for any major organization or brand.

Stephanie Smith is senior vice president, North American director of media services at MSL New York. She joined MSL New York from ABC News where she was a long-time network news producer who covered a wide-range of breaking news and feature stories for “World News Tonight with Peter Jennings,” “Good Morning America” and “Nightline.”

Mike’s PRescription: Don’t Be The Biggest Loser

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2012

MSLGROUP America’s Mike Huckman looks ahead at crisis PR in 2012 and lessons learned from 2011.