Archive for the ‘Silver Tsunami’ Category

Silver Tsunami: Driving in Old Age, When is it Time to Hand Over the Keys?

Monday, February 27th, 2012

For many older people, the ability to drive to the grocery store, doctor’s office or out to lunch whenever they want equates with freedom and control over their lives.

But sooner or later, most of us have to consider hanging up the keys for good. Knowing when that time comes, and knowing when to approach this touchy topic with older friends and relatives, may not be easy.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says in 2009 there were 33 million drivers age 65 and older. An average of 500 older people are injured every day in car crashes.[i]

But, the CDC says, not everyone over 65 who is behind the wheel is a menace on the highways. The rate of fatal crashes starts to increase at age 75 and jumps further after age 80. That’s not due to a greater tendency to get into crashes, but because of increasing susceptibility of seniors to injury and medical complications, the CDC says.

In fact, data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) suggests younger drivers may be more likely to cause accidents, even when older drivers are involved. The NHTSA says that in fatal crashes involving an older and a younger driver, the vehicle driven by the older person was nearly twice as likely to be the one that was struck (58% and 35%, respectively.)[ii]

Still, driving ability clearly can be affected by age-related conditions, such as a decline in vision that could make it harder to spot road hazards, physical changes that make it more difficult to move quickly from gas pedal to brake or turn to look out the back window when reversing, and cognitive changes that slow the ability to quickly assess and respond to changes in driving conditions. Medications for a variety of age-related conditions also can affect driving ability.

So, how can we know when it’s time to stop driving? The American Association for Retired Persons (AARP), in a recent article posted online, [iii] offers some warning signs, including:

  • Frequent near-accidents and close calls
  • Dents and scrapes on the car, fences, mailboxes, etc.
  • Getting lost, especially in familiar locations
  • Trouble seeing traffic signals and signs, road markings
  • Responding more slowly to unexpected situations or having trouble moving your foot from gas to brake pedal; confusing the two pedals

If you’ve seen these and other signs in a parent or other older relative, a second AARP article[iv] offers guidance on how to talk to them about the need to quit driving. Advice includes choosing the right person, whether spouse, doctor or adult child, to bring up the subject; choosing a private time for the conversation; and being prepared to suggest alternative transportation methods.

As the population of older drivers continues to rise, policy planners will have to take into consideration the need for transportation options for older people. Communities can help by providing education for older drivers and public information to foster greater awareness on the part of physicians, caregivers and family members to help older relatives avoid problems on the road.


[i] http://www.cdc.gov/Motorvehiclesafety/Older_Adult_Drivers/adult-drivers_factsheet.html


[ii] http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811161.PDF


[iii] http://www.aarp.org/home-garden/transportation/info-05-2010/Warning_Signs_Stopping.html


[iv] http://www.aarp.org/home-garden/transportation/info-01-2012/turning-in-car-keys-ask-the-experts.html?cmp=NLC-RSS-DAILY-BULLETIN

Silver Tsumami Blog: Can You Hear Me Now?

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

Remember those heavy metal concerts? And all the nights cramming for exams with Handrix and Cocker screaming through the headphones?

They may be history, but the hearing damage they caused might be just getting started.

About 36 million Americans have hearing loss, according to the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD).[i] It’s one of the most common ailments of older people, affecting one-third of people over age 60 and half of those over 85.[ii]

Age-related hearing loss, called presbycusis, develops gradually as a result of changes to structures or blood flow to the inner ear, the hearing nerve or the way the brain processes sounds, says the American Academy of Audiology.[iii]

Exposure to loud noise can damage hearing and may cause a ringing or hissing sound in the ears known as tinnitus, which affects 25 million Americans, including 12.3% of men and nearly 14% of women 65 and older, says NIDCD.

Other causes of hearing loss can include infections, heart conditions or stroke, head injuries, tumors or medications.

Yet, despite the dire figures, a study published in late 2010[iv] reported that a comparison of hearing surveys 40 years apart suggests that Americans have better hearing today than they did in the early 1960s, particularly in higher frequencies. Loss of hearing in the upper frequencies makes it harder to distinguish speech in the presence of background noise. Researchers aren’t sure why hearing has improved in the last four decades, but they suggest that greater attention to overall health, including reduced smoking, better treatment of childhood ear infections, and improved health care for people with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases may play a role. Workplace policies that require construction and manufacturing plant workers to wear ear protection also are likely to have reduced hearing loss for many people, the researchers say.

Hearing loss is treatable, and, as with many other conditions, the sooner it is detected the more effective treatment is likely to be, says Johns Hopkins Medicine,[v] which recommends a baseline test at least once for adults between age 21 and 60. Follow-up tests are needed if the screening test detects a problem.

Hearing aids – including new, sophisticated devices that fit in or near the ear canal, products that amplify the phone or TV, and special sound systems used in auditoriums, churches or other large spaces – are among options to improve life for people with hearing loss.

Paying for a hearing aid can be a challenge, though. The AARP says prices vary from $1,200 for a low-end device to $3,700 for a top-of-the-line hearing aid, and 80% of people need two.[vi]

Medicare doesn’t cover them and in most states, private insurance doesn’t either (exceptions are New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Arkansas, which require insurance companies to offer some coverage for adults). Many audiologists will reduce retail prices in some cases or establish a payment plan, and there are non-profits that offer assistance. Veterans can receive coverage if their hearing loss is related to their service or a condition being treated at a VA hospital, or if the loss interferes with daily activities.

Even though hearing loss can reduce quality of life for older people, it’s not likely that insurers, whether private or government-funded, will expand coverage to include hearing aids. Given that reality, it may be up to community groups, audiology associations, manufacturers and family members acting as advocates to step in, to make sure hearing tests are performed and that no one who needs a hearing aid has to do without one.

Anita Manning is a former award-winning newspaper reporter and editor. During her more than 28 years with Gannett and USA Today, she covered a wide range of health topics, focusing primarily on infectious diseases, vaccines and diabetes. Her beat areas also included pandemic preparedness, bioterrorism and food safety. Anita also has served as a media consultant, working with clients, including pharmaceutical companies and non-profits. She has been a featured speaker or panelist at meetings sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

[i] http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/Pages/quick.aspx

[ii] http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/Pages/older.aspx

[iii] http://www.audiology.org/resources/consumer/Documents/AgeRelated_hearingLoss.pdf

[iv] http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/news/releases/10/Pages/121710.aspx

[v] http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/hearing/hearing_testing/index.html

[vi] http://www.aarp.org/health/conditions-treatments/info-05-2011/paying-for-hearing-aids.html

Silver Tsunami Blog: Keeping Fit Pays Off for Years to Come

Monday, January 23rd, 2012

If anyone needs to hear one more reason to get out there and exercise every day, here it is: A new study found that men who were fit in their 40s and kept it up for ten years had a 28% reduced risk of death due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading killer of men, compared to less fit cohorts.

In the study, published in the December 6, 2011 issue of Circulation and summarized in MedPage Today, researchers at the University of South Carolina at Columbia looked at records of 14,345 men enrolled in the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study, a prospective observational study. Participants had at least two medical examinations between 1974 and 2002 and were evaluated for fitness based on measures taken during a treadmill test. The researchers reported that, during more than 11 years of follow-up after their last medical exam, 914 men died from all causes and 330 died from CVD.

The study, which involved men ages 20 to 100, found those who improved their fitness had a 40% lower risk of death from any cause, and a 44% reduced risk of CVD death compared to men who remained unfit, after adjusting for changes in lifestyle (smoking, for instance) and medical conditions (e.g., blood pressure, diabetes). Interestingly, Body Mass Index, BMI, a measure of body fat relative to height, had no impact on those who were fit and remained so. BMI had some impact on those who lost fitness or were unfit to begin with, though it was not statistically significant.

The results suggest that staying fit or improving fitness corresponds to a lower risk of death in men from cardiovascular disease and from all other causes. The researchers conclude, “Preventing age-associated fitness loss is important for longevity regardless of BMI changes.”

It all adds up. We have learned in study after study that physical activity far outpaces an apple a day in keeping the doctor away. The American Heart Association says exercise improves cardiovascular risks, boosts circulation of oxygen to the brain and heart and burns calories. It also improves mood and strengthens the immune system.

Both in terms of improving quality of life and reducing health costs, it makes perfect sense for employers, physicians and communities to encourage daily physical activity at all ages. The hard part is getting people moving, which has never been easy. Doctors need to continue to emphasize the importance of physical activity for their older patients. Friends and family can help by offering to work out together, which provides significant social benefits along with the physical perks. Seniors can help themselves by finding exercise they like and can have fun with. The message is clear: even simple activity is beneficial, and a little bit can make a big difference. Now, let’s get going!

Anita Manning is a former award-winning newspaper reporter and editor. During her more than 28 years with Gannett and USA Today, she covered a wide range of health topics, focusing primarily on infectious diseases, vaccines and diabetes. Her beat areas also included pandemic preparedness, bioterrorism and food safety. Anita also has served as a media consultant, working with clients, including pharmaceutical companies and non-profits. She has been a featured speaker or panelist at meetings sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

—————————————————————

http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/124/23/2483.full

http://bit.ly/tsMtiK

http://bit.ly/j5mcBD

Silver Tsunami Blog: Living with Multiple Chronic Diseases

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

As we age, we’re more likely to experience multiple medical problems. About 80% of people age 65 and older have one chronic disease and half have more than one, says the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention[i]. And every day, 10,000 more people in the U.S. turn 65. [ii]

Annals of Family Medicine, a journal of the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) focuses it’s January/February 2012 issue on “multimorbidity, the coexistence of multiple chronic health conditions in a single individual.’’ [iii] It’s “a phenomenon that is growing at an alarming rate and bankrupting the U.S. health care system,’’ the academy says. By 2020, a quarter of the entire population will have multiple chronic conditions, and managing those conditions will ring up a price tag of $1.07 trillion, the journal says.

Through several articles and an editorial, researchers and other experts address the causes of ineffective and costly treatment of patients with multiple chronic conditions. Chief among them is the acute-care approach of the U.S. medical system, which often fails to address the underlying chronic care needs of patients, leading to medical errors, adverse drug reactions, poor disease monitoring, under-diagnosis and other problems.

Many people who have a family member affected by complex and diverse medical issues have seen this in action: specialists in one disease area may overlook or lack expertise in treating a concurrent condition that might be more urgent; patients may not inform the doctor of all medications and medical conditions for which they are being treated; or patients may not have access to all the care and support needed.

One way to address these concerns, the researchers propose, is to make greater use of the “medical home’’ concept [iv]. The AAFP describes this idea as a primary care office that serves as a central medical access point focusing on the “whole person.’’ Each patient is provided with a personal physician who coordinates their care based on needs and priorities. Patients in this model have access to their own medical information via a secure on-line system, same day appointments, email communications and tailored information about screening and treatments.

An analysis by researchers at University of California, Davis, of data on 52,241 patients ages 18 to 90, found lower rates of death among those whose source of medical care offered treatment through a “medical home” setting, reinforcing that the approach works.

Other articles in the journal discuss the effectiveness of a team-based approach to caring for patients with multiple chronic diseases, something that is standard practice in some hospitals and large medical practices. This approach could be extended to collaborations among smaller practices with support, including the integration of care coordinators with primary care physicians, and additional reimbursement for time spent coordinating care.

Dr. Elizabeth Bayliss, associate editor of Annals of Family Medicine and director of scientific development at the Kaiser Permanente Institute for Health Research, in an accompanying editorial, calls for “effective, integrated, multidimensional care management for patients with complex care needs,’’ and expresses hope for a change in reimbursement policies that will encourage comprehensive management and improved care for the growing number of people with one, two or more chronic medical conditions.

Clearly, the need for strategies to better coordinate effective care for people with more than a single medical condition is here, and will become more urgent as the proportion of the medically complex population over 65 increases. Until better systems are in place, the onus continues to be on individual patients and healthcare professionals to better communicate with one another about the diagnosis of multiple illnesses and the medications used to treat them.

Anita Manning is a former award-winning newspaper reporter and editor. During her more than 28 years with Gannett and USA Today, she covered a wide range of health topics, focusing primarily on infectious diseases, vaccines and diabetes. Her beat areas also included pandemic preparedness, bioterrorism and food safety. Anita also has served as a media consultant, working with clients, including pharmaceutical companies and non-profits. She has been a featured speaker or panelist at meetings sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

________________________________________
[i] http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/AAG/aging.htm

[ii] http://www.silverbook.org/browse.php?id=57

[iii] http://www.annfammed.org/

[iv] http://www.aafp.org/fpm/2007/0900/p38.html

Flu shots less potent than believed – still better than nothing

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2011

As flu season gets under way and health officials begin the annual campaign to encourage vaccination, a new study finds that the flu shot doesn’t provide as much protection as health officials thought, especially in the older people.

In a recent issue of The Lancet, Michael Osterholm, Ph.D., M.P.H., an infectious disease expert at the University of Minnesota, reported that a meta-analysis of rigorously conducted flu studies shows the annual flu shot is only 59% effective in healthy adults, ages 18-65.

In people over 65 – who account for 90% of flu-related deaths and more than 60% of hospitalizations – there is no clear evidence that the flu vaccine provides any protection at all. It is well-known that older people have a weaker immune response to flu vaccines than younger people do, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated the vaccines were 70-90% effective overall. (more…)